Installing an activist liberal majority on the Supreme Court will put religious liberties at risk for generations to come.

Last Thursday, our Supreme Court backed that local governments can co-opt private property, and give it to another private entity, for economic development.

I didn't quite agree with the Supreme Court ruling that forced civic clubs to take women.

I'm a graduate of Princeton, and I just want to say you don't have to go to an Ivy League school to be on the Supreme Court.

We may not be able to control the Supreme Court... but we can control the money.

It's terribly important that we extend the promise of equality that the Supreme Court and that the district court articulated in the DOMA case and in the Perry case to all Americans in all 50 states.

The reversal of a Supreme Court opinion is possible.

Nobody is entitled to a promotion to the Supreme Court.

My gut tells me that the Supreme Court will rule the subsidies to be illegal, and therefore, Obamacare will fail.

A decision by the Supreme Court to subject Guantanamo to judicial review would eliminate these advantages.

This is the most historic moment in Supreme Court history in our lifetime, no question about it. These are justices who are going to serve for decades.

President Obama had two Supreme Court nominees in his first term. There was no filibuster against them.

A Supreme Court decision that concessions of this sort were unconstitutional would have taken them off the table and actually increased the effective sovereignty of elected officials.

In our system of government, the Supreme Court ultimately decides on the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress or of presidential actions. When their actions are challenged, both Congress and the president are entitled to have their positions forcefully advocated in court.

In 2006, I argued and won Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, a Supreme Court case that struck down President George W. Bush's use of military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the most liberal and illumined of the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is not the impetus for constitutional change - we are.

The Supreme Court has been clear that states have the right to protect their citizens against out-of-state regulations that would burden those citizens.

The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that marriage is one of the most fundamental rights that we have as Americans under our Constitution.

I think the Supreme Court has not yet caught up to an era in which one keeps one's papers in a cloud, not a castle.